|
When you are learning material--in school, from
books, on TV, on the computer, from other people, politicians or
special interest groups, or almost anywhere--you may wonder how
they know. In fact, a very good question to ask is, "How do
you know?" You may find that people often say "I read
it in a book" or "I heard it on the radio" and the
question becomes "How do they know?"
Science is a process of gathering data, making
inferences, and drawing conclusions. It is very difficult to prove
an experiment is right, but one good experiment to the contrary
can prove it wrong. Much of science has been proved by what is called
'a preponderance of evidence' in a court of law. In other words,
so many experiments have been done on the subject, and all point
in the same direction. Thus it seems likely that a true explanation
has been found. The Big Bang, Evolution, Global Warming, and Plate
Tectonics are all examples of theories that are considered true
because of the preponderance of evidence.
However, how much evidence is enough evidence?
This is a problem you will need to grapple with soon, when you design
your own experiment, and throughout life. If I do an experiment
once and I get a result, is that enough to make valid conclusions?
What if I do it 10 times? 100 times? When you hear politicians and
scientists talk about Global Warming, some say there is enough evidence
and others say there isn't. How can you know who to believe?
I wrote a masters thesis on micropaleontology.
This is the study of microorganisms. Mine happened to be from the
oceans. If micropaleontologists want to get an accurate idea of
what organisms are found in a sample, they look at the sample under
the microscope and they count how many different species they find.
But how many do they have to count to get a good idea? What if they
happen to pick an area that has a clump of one species. If I asked
you to take a walk in the woods and tell me what kind of trees there
are, how far would you have to walk find all the different kinds
of trees? What if you looked around and saw only one tree, does
that mean that the forest is made of only one kind of tree? In micropaleontology,
it was considered that if you counted 301 fossils from one sample
you would generate a statistically accurate count.
There comes a point in most fields that
most of the professionals agree that enough data has been collected
to create good results. The number needed will vary. As a member
of society, you need to be aware of this and you need to ask the
critical question when people tell you that something is happening.
How do you know?!
Assignment:
Watch the Oregon Field Guide Video "Coastal Erosion"

 |
Coastal
Erosion
Scientists
are concerned over evidence that sand is actually disappearing
from the Oregon and Washington coastlines.
|
Pay attention to what is happening, the evidence
for it, and the conclusions they draw. Then answer the following
questions on the Coastal Erosion worksheet.
1. What is the main premise of this study
2. Name at least four sources of evidence that support the main
idea of this study
3. Do you think that there is enough evidence to support the idea
that the problem described is occurring on a large scale? Why or
why not?
4. Based on the evidence cited in this report, would you be willing
to pay extra tax money to help fix this problem?
5. How much evidence is necessary to prove this point?
You
have completed Unit 3. Go on to Unit 4, Collections >>
|